Whatever I Want
Friday, July 24, 2026
My Ranking of Every TØP Album
Friday, July 17, 2026
Who is my Favorite Spider-Man?
Note here at the beginning: These things I'm discussing aren't specifically the actors, although their acting does of course play a role. These things are the writing, directing, acting etc. etc. When I'm comparing their Spider-Mans, I'm not saying "Which actor did the best job in their portrayal?", it's much more broad than that.
I remember reading online many moons ago that Tobey Maguire has the best Peter Parker, Andrew Garfield has the best Spider-Man, and Tom Holland is solid in both categories. Now, after finally watching the Tobey Maguire films, I can say that I would generally agree with this take.
The way Andrew's Spider-Man uses his webs for movement is just next level. It is so cool. Tobey Maguire's emotional conflicts in his relationships of his Peter Parker life are so so good. And, yeah, Tom's Spider-Man is solid in both categories.
Granted, I say all this, and WE'RE ABOUT TO GET ANOTHER SPIDER-MAN FILM. I am so excited. And obviously that film will have its effects on this entire conversation, but I wanted to write my pre-Brand New Day thoughts. These thoughts aren't in any real order.
I think the Tobey Maguire's version of Uncle Ben dying was miles better than Andrew's. Andrew's just felt like a water-downed version of the same thing. Even with the "the last thing Peter said to his Uncle was mean" didn't feel as much of a gut-punch in The Amazing Spider-Man because it kind of felt like a valid crash-out on Peter's side. Versus in Tobey's, Peter's words were simply uncalled for, which made the regret of them being the last words hurt a lot more.
Of course, to be fair to Andrew's, it's not like they could just copy paste the events over, which makes it a little awkward. I think this is one of the reasons Homecoming decided to just skip over the origin story altogether. That being said, I did miss it a little in the Homecoming film; I'm curious to see how they would have done it, but, that being said, I don't necessarily think they made the wrong choice skipping it.
Now, that being said, I do prefer Andrew Garfield's version of learning about his powers compared to Tobey Maguire's. Not by a huge margin, though.
I think Peter Parker is a little too cool in The Amazing Spider-Man films for me. But at the same time, I appreciate the fresh take on it.
I think the writing in Tobey's films is probably overall the strongest, even if I currently have Spider-Man 3 as my least favorite Spider-Man film. Spider-Man 1 and 2 just carry, I think the stories there are really really good. And I think Spider-Man 3 ultimately sticks the landing by the end of the film, which is important.
I think the actors themselves all did a great job. Even though I think Andrew's Peter is a little too cool, he absolutely killed it in the acting department. For me personally, I felt that Tobey's acting was a step below the other two.
The final thing I wanted to talk about, which ultimately is the main motivating factor for my final answer, is the question of which Peter Parker do I care about the most as a character. Which one do I suffer the most when they suffer?
And, for me personally, that would be Tom Holland's Spider-Man by a landslide. Is this perhaps because he's part of a bigger universe and thus has appeared in other movies? Almost assuredly. Is this perhaps because he was my first Spider-Man. Probably yes as well. But I care so much more for his Peter Parker + supporting cast than I do for either Andrew or Tobey.
And that's why, ultimately, my answer to who's my favorite Spider-Man is Tom Holland. I'm not saying his movies are the best or that he's the best actor out of the three, but he is my favorite Spider-Man.
Saturday, July 11, 2026
25 Minutes of Me Talking about Project Hail Mary Book/Movie
Sunday, June 28, 2026
The Melancholy After Finishing a Book
It's this feeling of almost melancholy. A feeling that's a mix of peace and sadness and longing. I think the core of it is the fact that I won't hear from those characters again. That those characters' time in my life are at a close.
I don't know how to describe it precisely. Melancholy is definitely a good word for it.
Thursday, June 18, 2026
Why Hogwarts Legacy Fell Flat For Me
So I recently played through Hogwarts Legacy, a game I've been looking forward to playing through ever since I saw one of the original trailers. And, sadly, the game really fell flat for me. I wanted to take this post to explain why.
I wanted to caveat here that I can easily see why others might have a phenomenal time with it. I'm just here to explain why the game didn't work for me (and by extension, why the game might not work for you).
1. Too Much Dialogue (for a guy like me)
| Message from my cousin Joseph |
Yes, yes, to be perfectly fair to Hogwarts Legacy, I'm very much a certified story-hater in video games. This isn't to say it's the case with every game. Celeste hit perfectly for me. I'm 15 hours into Clair Expedition 33 and the story/writing has been phenomenal so far. How Hades story fit into the gameplay loop was peak. There's some good stuff out there for sure. Buuuut, overall I often find dialogue cumbersome and the story disinteresting. Gameplay is by far and away more important to me. But, even with that in mind, this game has SO much dialogue. I thought it was going to calm down after the first initial story, but nope. I watched a vast majority of the cutscenes, but ahhhh so much time with textboxes, just let me play the game! It didn't take me terribly long to start skipping every textbox imaginable, which did improve my experience. But that didn't even let me skip all the dialogue! Because many quests began with you just following another character as y'all walk and talk. It was not fun.
2. Overall Too Easy (and this fed into many of my other problems)
There's more I could write here, but it felt like opening a can of worms, so I'm going to attempt the path of not writing anything at all (besides this sentence, of course).
3. Combat (and spells) Quickly Felt Samey
Initially I enjoyed combat and thought the different spells were cool. However, and I think definitely in part because of the lack of difficulty, combat became very spell spammy. I was literally just pressing whatever spell whenever. And spamming roll.
The different enemies had different weakness and stuff, but I just rarely felt the need to exploit them. You could just mash spells and it would be fine.
4. The Bosses were Uninspiring
They frequently just felt like normal enemies with larger health pools. Which meant it wasn't any more fun and instead just felt more annoying if you died.
5. Didn't Feel an Incentive to Explore
Because the game was too easy, I felt no real desire to go out of my way to level up. And because the combat became disinteresting to me, that core gameplay loop wasn't appealing either. This meant I never cared to do any Exploration Challenges in the Field Guide.
Conclusion
I feel like I could dig into those five reasons more alongside a couple others, but the more I tried to dig, the more incredibly subjective it felt. The way I have it currently written feels somewhat objective, though, which I want. Because, like, fundamentally I can tell there's a lot of good stuff in this game (it's simply fun to be in the wizarding world, flying is just cool, the storyline is solid, you have other cool wizarding things besides spells like potions and beasts, big skill tree to explore, the Field Guide is plump with things to accomplish), so I can see why someone else might love it.
And there was enough for me, even with my gripes, to finish it. I rather enjoyed my first ~10 hours. Next 10 it was okaaay. Next 10 I was honestly dragging my feet just to finish it. So, sadly, I walk away from the game with a generally negative view of it, or, at least, my time with it.